Latest Law Related Forum Topics:

  • How do I become an airplane mechanic? (7 posts)
  • flying lessons? (8 posts)
  • Can anyone indentify this Biz Jet? (7 posts)
  • if you've ridden: what do you think of amtrak's services? (3 posts)
  • im scared of planes :[? (6 posts)
  • how much do people make working at the airport? (5 posts)
  • Pilot Lesson materials? (5 posts)
  • What happens after waste is seperated, treated on aeroplanes during flight? Is it released outside in-flight? (7 posts)
  • CA I carry a replica bb gun of an M16 and 9mm on a flight from Miami/Ft lauderdale to Haiti? (9 posts)
  • how do i switch to the tower view at the airport i'm landing at??.? (2 posts)
  • Experience or college? (6 posts)
  • Who invented the WigWag? (5 posts)
  • Talking to my Guidence counselor about Airline Job.......? (3 posts)
  • Do Air Transat planes have seat-back tvs in economy class? (3 posts)
  • can you believe the size of steam locomotives? (8 posts)
  •  
    Author Message

    Guineapig

    Members


    Online status

    84 posts

    Location: Cambodia
    Occupation: Teacher
    Age:

    #41744   2008-05-17 01:52 GMT      
    Why did they get rid of steamers?I think they were more powerful and efficient than diesel trains are.My granduncle used to work for the railroad,and he remembers the old steamers.He was sad to see them go.I've always wanted to see one run,or even ride in the cab of one!

    Herdleader

    Members


    Online status

    70 posts

    Location: Costa Rica
    Occupation: Entrepreneur
    Age:

    #41745   2008-05-17 02:02 GMT      
    Steam locomotives are less powerful, less efficient, more polluting, need water to be supplied regularly, uncomfortable for drivers, noisy etc. That is why they were phased out, when diesel and electric locos came.

    Standoutfromthecrowd

    Members


    Online status

    73 posts

    Location: Saudi Arabia
    Occupation: Crystallographer
    Age:

    #41746   2008-05-17 02:13 GMT      
    They require much more maintenance.And are more expensive to keep running.
    As a side note China was still building and using steamers up until the late 1970's. China at that time was poor,but there labor was cheap and they had plenty of coal.

    CreamPetals

    Members


    Online status

    108 posts

    Location: Papua New Guinea
    Occupation: Instructor
    Age:

    #41747   2008-05-17 03:10 GMT      
    Business, railroads are in the business to make money and diesel locomotives cost much much less to own and operate then steam.
    If steam was better, it would still be there, simple fact of business sense.

    My Dad was a steam engineer too but steamers were not as efficient, they polluted more, they cost more to maintain.
    They were the best available in their day but that day is over.

    Evilsquirrel

    Members


    Online status

    81 posts

    Location: Seychelles
    Occupation: Numerologist
    Age:

    #41748   2008-05-17 03:32 GMT      
    I am very fortunate in that I have worked aboard several old steamers including the SP 4449, the UP 8444 (844, but numbered 8444 when I worked on it in '81), both "Northern" class locos with a 4-8-4 wheels arrangement, the UP 3985, a "Challenger" class articulated, a 4-6-6-4, and had a ride on a "shay" logging locomotive, restored and operating with the Roaring Camp and Big Trees restored logging/tourist operation. I was a small boy and my dad was at the throttle. I seem to remember thinking that didn't seem like a good idea to me... my dad was never an engineer...

    I did get to sit behind the throttle of McCloud River Rail Road's #25, a "Prairie" type loco with a 2-6-2 wheel arrangement. This is the engine seen in the film, "Stand By Me." The railroad is right here in town on the western end, but they have now suspended all steam operations. Too expensive !

    All were fun for a day, but I wouldn't have wanted to work on them all the time. Boiling hot or freezing cold, there was little in between, very poor visibilty, especially with the widows constantly fogged up with steam in the winter, no dynamic brake, relatively primative air brake systems, the list of negatives is long, in addition to what has been accurately said above.

    Would I get on one tomorrow? In a heartbeat. There is not another experience on the planet like it.

    But you, and anyone else who can afford to make the trip and pony up an additional $600 when arriving in Ely, Nevada, can spend half a day running one of two restored steam engines owned and operated by the Nevada Northern Railroad, with their "Rent An Engine" program. The monies they receive is put back into other restoration projects under way.

    $600 will get you out on the main line on a Baldwin Consolidation (2-8-0 wheel arrangement) or a "ten-wheeler" (4-6-0 wheel arrangement) running around the yard for around $450, after a couple of hours in the class-room. You'll be supervised, of course.

    They also have a number of restored vintage diesel electric locomotives that rent for considerably less.

    There you can realize your dream !

    Have fun...

    Nightlife

    Members


    Online status

    82 posts

    Location: Qatar
    Occupation: Master of Ceremony
    Age:

    #41749   2008-05-17 06:01 GMT      
    Steam locomotives are much less fuel-efficient than diesel locomotives and are also much more labour intensive and require more infrastructure to maintain them (water columns, turntables, coaling stages, etc.)

    Also they waste fuel and water because they keep consuming both even when doing no work so they can stay in steam, whereas a diesel engine can be shut down.

    That said there are many preserved lines around run by volunteers who restore and maintain steam locomotives so it is still possible to see them and even enjoy a footplate experience.

    The link below will take you to a railfans' site where you can find out details of where to see preserved steam engines.

    DTrain

    Members


    Online status

    58 posts

    Location: Mozambique
    Occupation: Concierge
    Age:

    #41750   2008-05-17 09:10 GMT      
    Hi Kylie

    First, to the above poster, steam locomotives were not retired because they were less powerful, which is a common misconception (they were actually much, much more powerful than the first diesel-electric models which replaced them).

    They were retired from daily freight service because steam locomotives are simply too maintenance intensive and require many more fuel stops than diesels, so it was a double-edged sword (they were more expensive to operate and slower in moving freight and passengers than diesels). Because of this railroads were willing to sacrifice horsepower for speed and reduced maintenance costs.

    Luckily, though, you can still ride behind them on tourist railroads all around the country! Some of the most famous that use steam include the Strasburg Railroad in Lancaster Pennsylvania, Cass Scenic in Cass West Virginia (which use the unique geared Shays, Heislers, and Climaxes), and the Durango & Silverton in western Colorado. These are just a few though, they're several others (the link below is a guide to most of them around the country).

    In any event, if you get a chance to ride behind a steamer or see it up close, have fun, they are definitely something to see!

    WorldWideWonder

    Members


    Online status

    97 posts

    Location: Panama
    Occupation: Meteorologist
    Age:

    #41751   2008-05-17 11:46 GMT      
    diesel is more efficient thus overwriting the "steamers"

    SplitPersonality

    Members


    Online status

    93 posts

    Location: Cameroon
    Occupation: Weatherman
    Age:

    #41752   2008-05-17 12:48 GMT      
    Kylie-

    I am a member of Niles Canyon Railway in Sunol, CA. We have two operating 2-6-2 Locomotives and are currently working on our 3rd.

    The maintenance requirements for bi-weekly operations is very extensive and expensive. Though these are really nice to see in operations, our environmental permits must be kept up to date, and cost almost as much as the maintenance of these beasts.

    Steam as the other folks have pointed out was mainly phased out because of the cost of operation and the pressure on pollution control. Union Pacific is currently feeling some of the same issues in their Roseville Yard as the city of Sacramento is requested they shut down ideling locomotives or place scrubber hoods over the stacks. Eventhough, these are diesels, the railroads and under pressure to keep their fuel emissions to a minimum.

    As for getting a ride, well depending on where you are located there are many excursions available in California.

    The California Western Railroad, (Fort Bragg to Willits)
    Roaring Camp & Big Trees Railroad, (Felton, CA)
    Niles Canyon Railway, (Sunol, CA)
    Yosemite Valley & Sugar Pine Railroad, (Sonora, CA)
    Sacramento Northern Short Line, (Sacramento, CA)
    Durango and Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad, (Durango, CO)
    Cumbres and Toltec Railroad, (Chama, NM)
    Jamestown Railroad Museum, (Jamestown, CA)
    Portola Valley Railroad Museum, (Portola, CA)

    Here check this out:

    www.railserve.com

    That is going to give you the most complete listing of current excursions for both steam and diesel.

    Just for the record, the Friends of the 4449 Club out of Portland, Oregon also does excursions behind the Southern Pacific GS-4 #4449. She is a beauty, and my absolute favorite locomotive. I have 8 different HO Scale models of her from plastic to Brass, and composite, and 1 "O" Scale Model of her from Sunset that was a Limited Edition run.

    Enjoy your trains!
    > 1 <